Keyplay reposted this
The idea of "signal-based" sales or marketing is great in theory. Signals can be gold. But in practice, we’re ending up with a new form of spray and pray. This is how it looks: “Hey I saw that you did {{insert signal or trigger}}… let’s book 15 mins to connect… or u ready to buy now?!” I joke, but you know these messages. I see three problems here: 1.) Signals ≠ personalization Signals are great for prioritization and timing. But signals alone don’t really help you personalize. There’s a translation required to understand how the signal maps to the buyers situation or problem. If you just insert {{signal name}} + pitch, you’re not much better than inserting their industry name. 2.) Signals don’t replace ICP With a solid ICP program, signals are magic for timing. But collecting signals doesn’t mean you can skip the ICP model. We all know the truth — a small number of people visiting the website or liking on social are actually a good fit. So you need a foundation of fit (account and persona) before acting on signals. Without ICP, signals can pull you in unproductive directions (non-ICP accounts, low quality leads, low ACV). This has a real opportunity cost. 3.) “Signal” is a blackhole word. We love our buzzwords. But “signals” can be soooo many things — intent signals, fit signals, engagement signals, problem signals, etc. Signal-first thinking can lead to boiling the ocean. It’s better if you work backwards. First — what are the plays and programs we want to run? Then — what are the signals we need to enable them? The idea of "signal-based" sales or marketing is great. Signals can be a huge lever. It's helpful to track them, aggregate them, and take action when you see signals that indicate intent or open the door to engage with your target buyer in a meaningful way. But they aren’t silver bullets. You still need the right foundation — the fundamentals still apply. #sales #marketing #b2b