Carlos F. Valdes’ Post

This article in The War Zone by Tyler Rogoway looks at the increasing volume of data becoming available on the performance of US Navy and allied navies' air and missile defence systems. The number and type of engagements against drones, cruise and ballistic missiles is giving a clear insight into how effective the sensors, combat management systems and missile effectors are against this range of threats. However, the same engagements are providing strategic competitors and potential adversaries with a wealth of intelligence on the performance of those same systems. These insights should help to confirm any conclusions being reached on the future shape of the Royal Australian Navy surface combatant fleet. #ausnavy #usnavy #royalnavy

https://lnkd.in/e37wGtSp Air defense and drone warfare observed in Ukraine are changing the nature of military helicopter tactics, moving the platforms’ center of gravity away from the tip of the spear to an emphasis on combat-support missions along the front lines, according to officials and issue experts.

Pilotless jet fighters that can fly 30 feet above the ground to their targets or straight toward a barrage of enemy missiles are being developed by the United States Air Force to help deter China. The soaring cost of existing military aircraft and advances in flying software have the Air Force pivoting toward a new generation of pilotless jets to bolster a fleet that its leaders say is the smallest and oldest since it became a separate service in 1947. The Air Force wants at least 1,000 of the mini-fighters now being developed, including hundreds within five years. They would escort and protect crewed aircraft such as the F-35 and the new B-21 bomber, carry their own weapons to attack other planes and targets on the ground and act as scouts and communications hubs in the sky. The drones, known as Collaborative Combat Aircraft, or CCAs, are part of a $6 billion program. https://lnkd.in/ee67fQ_f

Is this true? How does it affect Special Operations Group? We do not have sufficient troop strength to engage in a grinding war. Does this mean that air power is tempered by drones and missiles? I can see naval air carriers being limited but does our submarine force pick up the slack? Let me clearly articulate the US does not possess sufficient rounds to engage huge armies.

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace Launches NOMADS Mobile SHORAD NOMADS protects maneuvering army forces, transportation routes, command centers, and logistical areas in a dynamic land combat environment. The system’s high mobility, maneuverability, firepower, and level of protection meet the standards for mechanized units, providing comprehensive air defense coverage. https://hubs.la/Q02CBxpx0

🚀 Drone Warfare Revolutionizing Military Tactics! 💥 Some Facts: 🔹 Ukrainian military has achieved remarkable success in modern warfare using cost-effective drone technology (approximately 25 🇷🇺 vessels have been sunk)! 🇺🇦💪 🛰️ The 🇬🇧 Royal Navy, and 🇺🇸 US Navy are leading the charge in safeguarding Maritime traffic against Houthi drone and missile attacks with unparalleled precision and effectiveness! 💪🚢 💰 Let's talk numbers: With a fraction of the cost compared to traditional methods, drone (air and surface) strikes havr demonstrated the power of innovation in defense strategies. 💸💡 🎯 To enhance efficiency further, we're constantly exploring ways to optimize drone capabilities, improve targeting precision, and streamline operations. 🌐✨ The big questions now⁉️: How are we optimizing our weapons and sensors to tackle this evolving threat? Are we integrating new systems into our naval fleets to enhance cost-efficiency against drone adversaries? 🚀 Join the movement toward smarter, more cost-effective defense solutions! Together, we're shaping the future of warfare. 💼🌟 #DroneWarfare #MilitaryInnovation #DefenseTech #NavalStrategy #Innovation #SecurityAtSea #CostEfficiency #ModernWarfare #NavalTechnology #DefenseIndustry #FutureTech #InnovationInWarfare #NavalDefense #TechnologyAdvancement #StrategicDefense #UnmannedVessels #NavalOperations #InnovativeSolutions #royalnavy #usnavy 💥🔝

A new game-changing weapon that uses radio waves to stop enemy vehicles in their tracks and take down multiple drones at once is under development for our armed forces. To be delivered alongside our colleagues at Dstl, the Radio Frequency Directed Energy Weapon (RFDEW) system can detect, track and engage a range of threats across land, air and sea, and could offer a solution to keep our soldiers, critical assets and bases safer across the globe. ✅ Detect targets up to 1km away. ✅ Can be mounted on a variety of military vehicles. ✅ Cost-effective at 10p per shot fired.

Is this true? How does it affect Special Operations Group? We do not have sufficient troop strength to engage in a grinding war. Does this mean that air power is tempered by drones and missiles? I can see naval air carriers being limited but does our submarine force pick up the slack? Let me clearly articulate the US does not possess sufficient rounds to engage huge armies.

The exact capabilities of each US military aircraft and drone system are classified information. Knowing this information could be used to plan against US defenses, so it's not publicly available. However, I can share some general information about US airpower: * The US Air Force operates a vast fleet of fighter jets, bombers, and drones. * These aircraft carry a variety of conventional weapons, including bombs, missiles, and rockets. * Modern US weaponry is known for its precision and effectiveness. * The US Air Force trains extensively for various combat scenarios, including deploying large-scale air attacks. Would you like to learn more about: * Specific types of US fighter jets or bombers (e.g., F-22 Raptor, B-52 Stratofortress) * Different types of bombs and missiles used by the US Air Force * The role of airpower in modern warfare While I can't provide specific classified details, I hope this information is helpful!