ICC-ES AC156 is the most widely recognized testing procedure for #seismic certification of nonstructural components. By establishing requirements for seismic certification through #shaketable testing, AC156 ensures that your building products meet safety standards. #earthquakeproof #construction ICC-ES is the ONLY agency accredited to evaluate to its Acceptance Criteria. Ensure your products meet code requirements and get evaluated today. Apply now: https://lnkd.in/gxf_BUJT
ICC Evaluation Service (ICC-ES)’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
SERVICES: PDA Pile Monitoring and Dynamic Testing GRL performs Dynamic Monitoring and Load Testing of Deep Foundations innovatively and efficiently, responding to construction control codes and time and cost pressures. Using the Pile Driving Analyzer® (PDA) and CAPWAP®, GRL measures parameters useful for the development of pile installation criteria, simulates the load-set curve and assesses bearing capacity, soil resistance distribution, integrity and pile stresses along the length of the foundation. LEARN MORE: https://hubs.la/Q02d8KrS0 #GRLEngineers #CivilEngineering #DeepFoundationTesting #PDA #PileDrivingAnalyzer
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Good Sharing by Hamid. I have been doing RSR analysis since the late 80s. It has progressed from removing failed members during linear analysis in jacket structure upto plastic collapse as computing and softwares progressed. Assessed all available software at that time, and finally collaborate with Dave Garland from EDI developing SACS COLLAPSE based of Prof Bob Bea paper. Reason being, only SACS has the capability of modeling the non linear soil at that time. Most of the platform RSR is limited by the soil or pile failure. One can see that the jacket is very robust with many members, while the foundation is made up of usually 3, or 4 piles. Bigger structure with more piles will usually have a higher RSR.
What can help improve the ultimate strength of an existing offshore platform? Here is a tip that helps the structure reach a higher reserve strength and pass the target RSR. The structural Integrity (Ultimate Strength) of an offshore platform is mainly assessed by performing a nonlinear pushover analysis (Both SACS and USFOS can perform the analysis, I would prefer USFOS). Generally, a SACS model is available for an existing platform. This SACS model is converted to USFOS model to establish a nonlinear pushover analysis. As a normal practice, what has been used as “Yield Strength” in SACS models for steel material is “Nominal Yield Strength” which is the best for static design and re-analysis. However, when it comes to “Integrity Assessment” and nonlinear analysis to estimate the ultimate capacity/reserve strength of an offshore platform, API RP 2 SIM allows using “Mean Yield Strength” instead of “Nominal Yield Strength”. In more accurate words, when adequate data is available, the actual (coupon test or mill certification) or mean yield strength may be used instead of nominal yield strength. Be careful, “mean yield strength” should not be used when it is greater than “actual strength”. As per API RP 2SIM, the mean yield strength for 248 MPa (36 ksi) steel is estimated to be 276 MPa (40 ksi) to 317 MPa (46 ksi), with 296 MPa (43 ksi) being a reasonable average. #StructuralIntegrityAssessment #OffshorePlatform #PushoverAnalysis #APIRP2SIM #NauticMiddleEast
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Dynamic Time History Analysis for Fixed Offshore Platforms One of the challenges in the structural integrity assessment of existing platforms is to determine the DAF value, especially where the platform’s natural period is higher than 3 seconds after all brownfield modification and/or structural deterioration is considered. In this case, it is required to perform dynamic analysis. As per API RP 2A, for structural natural periods above 3 s, dynamic amplification is important, particularly for the lower sea states that may contribute the most to long-term fatigue damage. In these cases, it is recommended to perform a dynamic wave analysis to get the structural response accurately. One of the advantages of USFOS that I like is that it allows you to perform a dynamic time history analysis with full pile and soil included in the model. The maximum loads generated as per Maximum Overturning Moment (OTM), or Base Shear (BS) can be then recalled to perform a pushover analysis and derive the platform's Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR). Below is an illustration of the dynamic analysis performed in USFOS as part of the structural integrity assessment for a four-legged jacket. #StructuralIntegrityAssessment #OffshorePlatform #DynamicTimeHistoryAnalysis #DynamicAmplificationFactorDAF #USFOS
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What can help improve the ultimate strength of an existing offshore platform? Here is a tip that helps the structure reach a higher reserve strength and pass the target RSR. The structural Integrity (Ultimate Strength) of an offshore platform is mainly assessed by performing a nonlinear pushover analysis (Both SACS and USFOS can perform the analysis, I would prefer USFOS). Generally, a SACS model is available for an existing platform. This SACS model is converted to USFOS model to establish a nonlinear pushover analysis. As a normal practice, what has been used as “Yield Strength” in SACS models for steel material is “Nominal Yield Strength” which is the best for static design and re-analysis. However, when it comes to “Integrity Assessment” and nonlinear analysis to estimate the ultimate capacity/reserve strength of an offshore platform, API RP 2 SIM allows using “Mean Yield Strength” instead of “Nominal Yield Strength”. In more accurate words, when adequate data is available, the actual (coupon test or mill certification) or mean yield strength may be used instead of nominal yield strength. Be careful, “mean yield strength” should not be used when it is greater than “actual strength”. As per API RP 2SIM, the mean yield strength for 248 MPa (36 ksi) steel is estimated to be 276 MPa (40 ksi) to 317 MPa (46 ksi), with 296 MPa (43 ksi) being a reasonable average. #StructuralIntegrityAssessment #OffshorePlatform #PushoverAnalysis #APIRP2SIM #NauticMiddleEast
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
One remarkable advantage of SoluForce Flexible Composite Pipes (FCP or RTP) compared to its counterparts is the ability to install our pipeline system in incredibly tight spaces and challenging environments. What's more, our straightforward installation process requires only a small, localized team. This means we can navigate uphill terrain, pass beneath fences or roads, traverse rivers, and circumvent trees... you name it! These pipes have been extensively tested and verified for their resilience against external interferences, earthquakes, and landslides. Perhaps most importantly, installing SoluForce pipes has a minimal impact on the environment—an advantage that alternatives simply can't match. Visit our website for more information about our pipeline system: https://bit.ly/3OvArE9
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The #SoluForce range of products allows engineering teams greater flexibility in generating cost effective and technically viable solutions to otherwise problematic piping and materials transport problems. #pipelines #fcp #engineering
One remarkable advantage of SoluForce Flexible Composite Pipes (FCP or RTP) compared to its counterparts is the ability to install our pipeline system in incredibly tight spaces and challenging environments. What's more, our straightforward installation process requires only a small, localized team. This means we can navigate uphill terrain, pass beneath fences or roads, traverse rivers, and circumvent trees... you name it! These pipes have been extensively tested and verified for their resilience against external interferences, earthquakes, and landslides. Perhaps most importantly, installing SoluForce pipes has a minimal impact on the environment—an advantage that alternatives simply can't match. Visit our website for more information about our pipeline system: https://bit.ly/3OvArE9
SoluForce
soluforce.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Very useful information especially following the decision made by Wellington City Council on its proposed District Plan. Whilst the plan enables development (and much more than intended or required) there are other ingredients required such as building resilience requirements, building costs and compliance and increasing insurance costs. To build an affordable home, you need much more than a plan.
I've received a number of calls over the past couple of weeks from clients and industry partners about the draft TS1170.5 (consultation closes April 3rd, 2024), which builds on the recently updated National Seismic Hazard Model. We've produced a Q&A that may be of interest to anyone trying to understand what the draft Technical Specification means for their assets – and the design requirements for new developments in the years ahead. Please get in touch (email or DM) if you have any questions. #TS1170 #EarthquakeEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I provide online pre recorded trainings for mechanical designers who want to improve themselves, preparing to take PAE or PCE exams.
Smoke engineering control can be performed with prescriptive calculation to BS7346 or to NFPA92 method. The following slide just lined up the steps to be taken when undertaking the calculation. There are many constraints to size and depth of smoke reservoir in BS7346 but NFPA92 seems to be quite silent on it. Even if you want to do performance base smoke control using CFD calculations or zone smoke control using program like CFAST, it would be advisable to start of with prescriptive calculation to determine the extraction rate and use the extraction rate to perform the CFD. Then you can gradually lower the extraction rate in the simulation until you reach the minimum smoke layer base height or any other limiting criterias in accordance to the objective of your smoke control. Click and learn smoke control. https://lnkd.in/gBMy2SUU
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Alternating Current Field Measurement (ACFM) is a well-established technique used to efficiently inspect subsea and topside structural welds while they are in service. It offers an attractive alternative to Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) because it enables quick scans on surfaces that are coated and unprepared. Moreover, it generates detailed electronic records regarding the location, length, and depth of the detected cracks. This information is crucial for making informed decisions about asset integrity and optimizing repairs. ACFM is equally advantageous when applied to both ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic drillstring threaded connections. #ndt #ndtinspection #ndtinstrument #ACFM #magneticparticleinspection https://lnkd.in/gvdaqBhs
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Need a road map for analyzing the seismic/wind loads on mechanical equipment? Check it out here: https://lnkd.in/eFcjD5su #VISCMA #VISCMAMembers #VISCMAKnowledge #VibrationIsolation #TheRiskIsReal
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
owner at Cutting Edge Solutions LLC
1moOmega Flex products have been certified by ICC ES for seismic resilience.