José Saráchaga’s Post

View profile for José Saráchaga

Environmental Project Manager | Project Manager PMP® | OKRCP® | Scrum Master Certified SMC®| Environment | Energy | Contaminated Sites Investigation | Hydrogen | CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS) | Oil & Gas | Mining

A recent IEEFA report highlights the limitations of blue hydrogen for steel production decarbonization: 1. Inefficiency of CCS: Carbon capture underperforms, with capture rates falling below the 95% threshold claimed by proponents. 2. Methane Emissions: Significant methane leakage challenges blue hydrogen’s viability under stringent global emissions standards. 3. Strategic Risk: Investments in blue hydrogen risk obsolescence as green hydrogen becomes cost-competitive by decade’s end. 4. Market Resistance: Steelmakers and end-users increasingly reject fossil-based hydrogen due to sustainability concerns. 5. Cost and Volatility: High gas prices and CCS costs undermine blue hydrogen’s competitiveness against modular green hydrogen solutions. Green hydrogen remains the most effective path for decarbonizing steel production, despite its current costs. Source: IEEFA Report. Image: IEEFA Report #GreenHydrogen #SteelDecarbonization #CCS #H2 #Hydrogen https://lnkd.in/e_D5YJzC

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics