Steven Bowen’s Post

View profile for Steven Bowen

Sustainability meets strategy & finance @thesustainableinvestor.org.uk

Is de-carbonising our cities just about the best technology and funding. Absolutely not. People matter. If we don't get local communities on board, then at best our projects get delayed and at worst abandoned. Much of what I read on making our sustainable cities is about either the right technology (insulation, heat pumps, building materials, demolition vs refurbishment etc) or the financial implications. But much less is written on the social factors that help get these projects off the ground faster (or even at all). As a finance person I have seen numerous 'good' projects that have either taken way too long to get built, or that never happened at all. And this was not because they were bad projects. It was about social licence. We have talked a fair bit about social licence before in the context of mining and heavy industry. But the same issues also apply in different ways to cities and buildings. And this is why a recent report entitled Advancing Just Transitions in the Built Environment from the Institute of Human Rights and Business caught our eye. They make the point that "while some decarbonisation initiatives are reducing inequalities, others are leaving communities behind, generating greenlash - pushback to green initiatives - which costs valuable time, and money, and hinders the transition." And rather than talking about this in the abstract, they used a lot of city case studies. I picked Melbourne from the examples in the report, as it's a city I know well. While Australia is an affluent country, its cities share some common ground with other middle income cities. Housing is in short supply, it's often unaffordable, and it's generally not very energy or resource efficient. The residential sector is responsible for 30% of CO2 emissions in the State of Victoria (Melbourne is the state capital). Outside the city centre, 46.5% of residents have to drive to work. What were some of their practical recommendations (there is a longer list in the report). The first will be familiar - refurbishing for energy efficiency. Why is this a challenge? It's simple - cost and disruption. One solution that the report highlights is the Retain, Repair, Reinvest (RRR) Framework. Put simply it's about keeping communities in their neighbourhoods (Retain), refurbish existing buildings rather than demolish and rebuild (Repair), and then put the savings made back into improving comfort and upgrading public housing (Reinvest). And then there is re-skilling and re-training. Good well paid jobs for the local community. These projects are going to need a lot more construction workers, so lets tap into new groups for this. Lets start with the easy one, getting women into the industry. And they propose lots of practical actions. You can read the full blog for free at The Sustainable Investor (just follow the links in my profile). #sustainablefinance #strategy #cities

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics