Women's Aid Federation of England’s Post

1) Section 17 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 states that women in domestic relationships have the right to live in a shared household, even if they don't have a title, right, or beneficial interest in it. 2) The section also states that the respondent cannot evict or exclude the aggrieved person from the shared household without following the established legal procedure. 3) The right to reside in a shared household includes constructive residence, which means the right to reside in the shared household even if the woman is not actually living there 4) This right applies to women who are in a domestic relationship, even if they are not living with their husband at the time of the alleged domestic violence. 5) This includes widows, divorced women, and women who have been judicially separated

1) Section 17 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 states that women in domestic relationships have the right to live in a shared household, even if they don't have a title, right, or beneficial interest in it. 2) The section also states that the respondent cannot evict or exclude the aggrieved person from the shared household without following the established legal procedure. 3) The right to reside in a shared household includes constructive residence, which means the right to reside in the shared household even if the woman is not actually living there. 4) This right applies to women who are in a domestic relationship, even if they are not living with their husband at the time of the alleged domestic violence. 5) This includes widows, divorced women, and women who have been judicially separated.

1) Section 17 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 states that women in domestic relationships have the right to live in a shared household, even if they don't have a title, right, or beneficial interest in it. 2) The section also states that the respondent cannot evict or exclude the aggrieved person from the shared household without following the established legal procedure. 3) The right to reside in a shared household includes constructive residence, which means the right to reside in the shared household even if the woman is not actually living there 4) This right applies to women who are in a domestic relationship, even if they are not living with their husband at the time of the alleged domestic violence. 5) This includes widows, divorced women, and women who have been judicially separated

The recent Channel 5 programme, "A Killer Makes a Call"(https://lnkd.in/e2WBajaV), sheds light on a disturbing case where a wife murdered her husband and attempted to exploit the media-driven gender narrative surrounding Domestic Violence & Abuse (DVA) and coercive control to cover up her crime. This case is a stark reminder that while DVA and coercive control are critical issues that predominantly affect women, it is essential to approach each situation with a commitment to truth and justice, irrespective of gender. The weaponisation of these narratives not only undermines genuine victims but also distorts public perception, potentially detracting from the severity of these societal issues. Domestic Violence & Abuse and coercive control are grave concerns, with far-reaching consequences for victims, their families, and society at large. The overwhelming majority of victims are women, and addressing their experiences and needs must remain a priority. However, it's crucial to recognise that abuse can occur in any relationship, regardless of gender, and that the pursuit of justice must be impartial and evidence-based. The Channel 5 programme highlights the necessity for thorough and unbiased investigations in cases of alleged abuse. It is a call to action for all of us to ensure that our advocacy and support for victims are grounded in fairness and integrity. In our efforts to combat DVA and coercive control, let us remain vigilant against any misuse of these narratives. We must support all victims of abuse, uphold the truth, and work towards a society where justice prevails for everyone. #DomesticViolence #CoerciveControl #Justice #Truth #SupportVictims #FairnessInAdvocacy #Mankind #abuse #bullying

Let's support the Gaia Principle. Together, we can make a real difference for survivors. Find out more ⬇ #SurvivorsVoices #EndSexualViolence #SupportSurvivors #GaiaPrinciple #CriminalJusticeBill

Good to see institutional reform, including criminal justice reform called for, alongside cultural reform and prevention, in this Conversation article. Court decision-making both reflects and reinforces community attitudes. It sends messages both to the individual parties and, (as a powerful institution representing the state), to the community about violence against women. In the current community debate, can we afford to ignore the blatant victim blaming arguments and excuses for violence against women routinely used, often without limitation or judicial reprimand, in our court systems daily?

Why are more women not seeking legal action despite the severe harm and costs of domestic violence? This thought-provoking article delves into the barriers survivors face when pursuing justice. At #GQLaw, we’re committed to breaking down these barriers and providing the support you need. Read the full article here:

Powerful words from Karen Iles on how there can be no healing without justice, and only urgent and innovative changes to policing can deliver both to First Nations victims of murder, sexual assault and other serious crimes. https://lnkd.in/ggTDyTBX

We are seeing an epidemic of sexual violence and absolutely agree that the scale of this problem needs a joined-up response, including major investment in prevention. In Oxfordshire, as far as charging rates are concerned: ❗ Although we are seeing an increase in charging decisions from the police, there's no greater investment in capacity to process those cases. This has created a massive court backlog, which is only going to get worse. ❗ We still see that police officers often don't have time to follow up on their cases. It can take weeks if not months before a perpetrator is arrested or interviewed, which causes further distress for the survivor who's reported. ❗ In addition, due to lack of capacity, increased charging on recent cases means historic cases are being deprioritised. None of this should be acceptable, and we need to see radical change and commitment from the government following July’s general elections. https://lnkd.in/dyVvGEXG