Cath Bright’s Post

View profile for Cath Bright

Market Strategist, Content Writer and Management Skills Trainer - supporting businesses to grow and people to excel. No set offer. Tailored solutions to suit your needs and budget to help you grow your business.

Grey belt? Give me strength. The new definition for fields and green spaces that are not defined as AONB can now be built on with a minimum process for approval. Does no one in Westminster know why "green belt" was defined? To protect wildlife AND to prevent massive conurbations being created. It has been destroyed in Ipswich, which is now resulting in villages being swallowed up. Despite it being a conurbation, council boundaries remain the same, which means areas that people consider as "Ipswich" are not included in council services and decisions. Will a new city boundary and definition help? Meanwhile, hedgrows and wildlife lose habitat. Mmm, wonder why Suffolk has significant flood issues? There are brown sites that are derelict and need attention. More expensive to build on, more expensive to sort out hidden horrors beneath the soil before building can happen, and more creative design is needed than off-the-plan homes. I understand why developers prefer to destroy the countryside, but the government should be protecting the environment and making a change. There are other ways to deal with the housing crisis. And if the government is going to destroy the countryside further, maybe they could make sure the houses are built to new environment standards with appropriate heating, car charging and home working spaces. How will this lazy housing policy be married with environment and green issues? I watch with interest. #HousingCrisis #HousingDevelopment #ProtectingCountryside

  • No alternative text description for this image
Jessica Rolfe

Sales Representative for David Burr and MD of Rolfe and Johnson Home Dressers

8mo

I feel so passionately about this too! I’m truly devestated because once this land has been built upon, unlike other political decisions that can be undone and go back to times before, the damage is permanent. Whatever land we lose to this will be lost forever. When we have huge areas of ex commercial vacant properties across the country, our now quiet high streets and urban areas, vast plains of brownfield land rotting away, the idea of taking away any redeeming beauty left cannot be the right solution to this problem can it?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics