Human Rights and the Rule of Law’s Post

This paper from the Grant Jarvie and colleagues at the University of Edinburgh Academy of Sport is well timed. As the world turns its attention to Paris 2024, the Olympic and Paralympic Games stand at a crucial juncture, poised to shape perceptions of both France and the Olympic movement in our rapidly changing global landscape. France, currently navigating internal political challenges and broader geopolitical tensions, has a unique opportunity to showcase its resilience and values on the world stage. The Games' focus on sustainability, with 95% of venues being existing or temporary structures, aligns with growing global environmental concerns. However, challenges such as the ongoing debate over the hijab ban in sports reflect the complex interplay between national policies and international expectations. For the Olympic movement, Paris 2024 represents a critical moment to demonstrate its relevance and adaptability in the face of modern challenges. The push for gender parity and the inclusion of new sports like breakdancing signal efforts to evolve. Yet, contentious issues such as the participation of Russian and Belarusian athletes as neutrals highlight the movement's ongoing struggle to balance political neutrality with ethical considerations. The Games' impact extends beyond the sporting arena, potentially influencing diplomatic relations and cultural exchange. With over 200 nations participating, Paris 2024 offers a platform for dialogue and understanding in an increasingly fractured world. However, questions remain about the long-term impact of mega-events on host nations and the Olympic brand. Further research is crucial to understand how these Games can genuinely benefit communities and contribute to global cooperation. We need to examine how the spectacle of the Olympics translates into tangible outcomes for both France and the international community. As we approach Paris 2024, how do you think these Games will shape global perceptions of France and the Olympic movement? What role can mega-sporting events play in addressing global challenges and fostering international understanding? #Paris2024 #Olympics #GlobalPerception #SportDiplomacy

ACADEMY OF SPORT RELEASES NEW REPORT ON THE PARIS OLYMPICS   The University of Edinburgh’s international think tank on the world of sport is pleased to release PARIS OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC GAMES 2024: FACTS, MYTHS AND ISSUES. The report is the latest in a series of AOS research reports that have examined major sporting events. Paris is set to welcome 206 and 184 countries to the Olympics and Paralympic spectacle.    New facilities are not the norm with the Aquatics Centre and the Olympic Village being the only new builds included in the 15 Olympic and Paralympic venues. 5,000 proximity sports grounds are to be built across France to enable access to sport closer to home. As of 20 July, 31 neutral athletes from Russia and Belarus had accepted invitations and 26 have declined. IOC President Thomas Bach has confirmed Israel’s involvement in the XXXIII Olympiad. Afghanistan will be represented by 3 men and 3 women Afghan athletes who will compete under the black, red and green flag and anthem of the former Western backed republic. France’ s hijabs ban against Muslim women and girl athletes’ places France in breach of multiple obligations under international human rights treaties but also in breach of the IOC strategic framework on human rights.    One of the lessons for the UK and Scotland is the extent to which the French journey, from the bidding process that emerged in 2015 to the present, has involved an extensive diplomatic and cultural exchange network to advance French influence, trade and business. Paris 2024 provides the opportunity to witness the joy and despair of sport and an Olympic spectacle but also the opportunity for dialogue and connectivity in a troubled France and a troubled international landscape.    Paris 2024 is expected to be watched by 3 billion people and offers the opportunity for nations to engage on and of the sports field. Stuart MacDonald FRSA Stuart Murray Gavin Price Lindsay Sarah Krasnoff, PhD Sport for Development Coalition Danny Bisland Liz Grant Corinne Reid BBC News STV Group plc David Grevemberg CBE Centre for Sport and Human Rights Hala Ousta Madeleine Orr Alison Raw Layne Robinson Davies Banda PhD Dr Paul Widdop Greg McEwan Professor Ian P. Ruth Shaw OBE Catherine Carty UNESCO John Colquhoun Hitesh Patel Ollie Dudfield Chris Cox Hugh Dan MacLennan Honey Thaljieh Kevin James Alexandre Miguel Mestre Russell Dalgleish University of Toronto The University of Edinburgh Mark Munro  

So often, the diplomatic and 'soft power' opportunities of major events are squandered by inactivity. It is a disgraceful waste of public money in some instances and just a wasted opportunity in others. Hosting events is an expensive business and whilst bidders and organisers talk a good game the authorities and governments almost invariably squander the opportunities. Maybe countries are concerned about being accused of 'Sports washing,' but I think it's just a lack of intelligent strategy and an inability to implement. Seemingly, the French have had a good stab at it! "The extent to which the French journey, from the bidding process that emerged in 2015 to the present, has involved an extensive diplomatic and cultural exchange network to advance French influence, trade and business. #strategy #sports #consulting

In light of the forthcoming Olympics, a very useful read to understand the facts, myths, and issues of the Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games 2024

The first week of the 2024 Olympic Games has yielded many inspirational moments. And they have also exposed some of the less pleasant things that can happen in sport. Can we leverage all of these moments to make sport better? The Centre for Sport Policy Studies at the University of Toronto has shown that there is no "inspiration effect" from Olympic Games on sport participation. Addressing the known barriers to participation - beginning with cost - and centering participants in the design of sport experiences are the ways to improve participation. It's also important to recognize that a thriving sport ecosystem should not be singularly focused on creating Olympic (or professional) athletes (the motto of Sweden's sport system, for instance, is "As many as possible for as long as possible"). Similarly, if we want to truly address the unpleasant side of sport we can start by upholding athletes' rights. At all ages and stages, athletes have the right to practice their sport and compete without discrimination, and to participate in fair and clean conditions. There are many examples of how athletes' rights have been acknowledged: some countries, including Norway and the United States, have adopted Children's rights in sport for grassroots and community participation; many countries have Codes of Conduct to ensure rights for athletes at higher levels of participation; the IOC adopted the Athletes' Rights and Responsibilities Declaration for the 2024 Games. But words on paper alone will not ensure that these rights are upheld - it takes constant vigilance, diligence and strong leadership to manifest these rights. We will continue to be inspired for the remainder of the Games and throughout the upcoming Paralympic Games. And that inspiration should be our motivation to make sport better in the ways we know how.

"After years of fighting for global sport to recognize its impact and responsibility toward human rights, the year 2023 ushered in a new era – an era where human rights can no longer be ignored by sport governing bodies," writes Andrea Florence, director of the Sport & Rights Alliance. "With the Australia and New Zealand Women’s World Cup, this past year featured the first-ever mega sporting event to have human rights criteria included its Host Country Contract. We will see the same with this year with the #EURO 2024 and the Paris Summer #Olympics. "On the heels of the 2022 #Qatar Men’s World Cup, it’s also clear that public awareness for sport’s human rights problem has also never been higher. A YouGov opinion poll commissioned by our partner @Amnesty International proves this with data – over 50% of people surveyed in 15 countries said they believe human rights should be a critical consideration in deciding who hosts major international sporting events. "However, what 2023 has also proved is that policies and bidding processes are not enough – and maintaining the public’s faith that sport can and will be an authentic force for good is no small challenge." 📌 Read the rest of our director's reflections and the #SRA's 2023 #AnnualReport below. https://lnkd.in/dYATqzYR

Some thoughts on sport: This year marked my first UEFA European Championship viewing experience, and one standout narrative was the sporting prowess of Slovenia. With a population slightly surpassing 2 million, comparable to New Mexico, Slovenia consistently surpasses expectations in sports. This success piqued my curiosity. Slovenia's sporting achievements, boasting talents like Luka Doncic and Jan Oblak, can be attributed to its unique approach to accessibility. Almost 70% of Slovenians engage in recreational sports year-round, showcasing a stark contrast to profit-centric U.S. athletic structures. In Slovenia, the focus lies on inclusivity and training rather than just winning. This ethos stands in contrast to the U.S., where elite services often come with a hefty price tag, hindering widespread participation. The emphasis on equal access and comprehensive skill development, as exemplified by NBA MVP Nikola Jokic's experience, is pivotal. Embracing accessibility over exclusivity could foster a more competitive sports landscape, prioritizing player development over innate talent. To nurture a culture of athletic excellence, the U.S. must shift towards prioritizing accessibility, especially through public funding. Fostering an environment where every individual has equal opportunities to learn and grow will breed a nation of formidable athletes. Our nation's sports trajectory hinges on safeguarding children's play opportunities. By focusing on holistic athlete development rather than institutional profits, we can unlock the full potential of our society, transcending athletic realms to benefit all.

The Reading of the Day “Athlete and State: Qualifying for the Olympic Games in Ancient Greece” by Nigel B. Crowther (1996) Since their inception in Ancient Greece, the Olympic Games have been closely tied to the concept of "national prestige." Nations aiming to enhance their international reputation often seek out talented athletes from other countries, offering better financial incentives and training conditions. In the modern era, sponsorship is essential not only from governments but also from corporate brands to cover the extensive costs associated with high-quality athletic preparation. These sponsors are interested not only in athletic skills and talent but also in leveraging the market potential for promoting their brands. In contrast to today's commercialized environment, athletic facilities in Ancient Greece were freely provided to citizens and others. The Olympic Games were historically open to all social classes, and victors often emerged from diverse backgrounds (Young, 1985). This inclusivity suggests that there must have been significant financial support, either from the state or private benefactors. The dominance in sports at the Olympic Games is inherently political. Nations with substantial political, economic, and cultural influence often support their athletes to achieve excellence, viewing these competitions as a means of asserting national prestige. It is, in essence, a contest of image and power. In his book Life on the Run, Bill Bradley writes that athletes' self-definition “comes from external sources, not from within.”

In recent years, Hungary has emerged as a key player in the world of sports, with a growing ambition to host major sporting events. This drive to attract and organize prestigious competitions is a result of strategic sports politics that aim to not only promote the country on the global stage but also to boost tourism, infrastructure development, and national morale. One of the key elements of Hungary's sports politics is the investment in state-of-the-art facilities. The country has been actively upgrading and building new stadiums, arenas, and training centers to meet international standards. These modern facilities not only enhance the country's ability to host major events but also contribute to the overall development of sports at all levels. Additionally, Hungary has been proactive in bidding for and successfully hosting a range of sporting events. From the FINA World Aquatics Championships to the European Youth Olympic Festival, Hungary has proven its capability to organize and execute large-scale competitions. These events not only bring together athletes and spectators from around the world but also generate significant economic benefits for the host cities and regions. Furthermore, Hungary's sports politics prioritize the development of grassroots sports and youth programs. By investing in the next generation of athletes and providing them with the necessary support and training, Hungary aims to create a sustainable sports culture that can consistently produce top-tier talent. This focus on youth development not only benefits the country's sporting prowess but also contributes to the overall well-being and health of the population. In conclusion, Hungary's sports politics reflect a multifaceted approach to hosting sporting events, combining investments in infrastructure, successful bidding strategies, and a commitment to grassroots development. As Hungary continues to position itself as a leading destination for international competitions, it is clear that sports play a crucial role in shaping the country's identity and driving its future growth. #Hungary #SportsPolitics #SportingEvents #InfrastructureDevelopment #YouthDevelopment #GlobalSpotlight https://lnkd.in/e9a2XYjT

🏅💰 World Athletics introduce $50,000 Prize for Gold Medalists 💰🏅 This news that came out last week, marks a significant milestone in the world of Olympic sports (with plans to extend this to silver and bronze medalists in LA 2028). This move is not only a game-changer for individual athletes but also sets a precedent that could impact the wider Olympic movement. It addresses a longstanding concern about financial support for athletes, acknowledging the immense dedication and sacrifices they make in pursuit of excellence. As someone frequently approached about athlete funding, I understand the challenges faced by International Federations, National Olympic Committees, and Governing Bodies in allocating limited resources while striving to meet ambitious targets. So I applaud World Athletics' decision to do this, providing well-deserved support that can aid athletes all year round. But what does this mean for African athletes? ▶ Increased Financial Support: African gold medalists will see a substantial boost in their earnings, providing financial security and recognition for their hard work and talent. ▶ Retention of Talent: The introduction of substantial prize money could potentially stem the tide of African athletes switching allegiances to represent other nations, often due to financial constraints. This could lead to greater continuity and loyalty within African national teams. ▶ Enhanced Training Opportunities: With more resources at their disposal, African athletes can invest in better training facilities, coaching, and support staff, ultimately improving their performance on the global stage. What impact would this have across other Olympic Sports? Well, only time will tell. Between 2017 - 2021 International Olympic Committee – IOC made $7.6bn in revenue from the Olympic Games with 90% being redistributed back into sports. This development highlights the evolving landscape of Olympic Sports. Would like to get your thoughts on the potential impact of this? #paris2024 #olympicsport #olympics #athletewelfare #sportsbiz Africa Sports Unified https://lnkd.in/eVfW8G58