“The Global Stocktake climate agreement just finalised at this year's UN Climate Conference of the Parties (COP28) is in one sense hugely momentous as, for the first time in its 28-year history, it puts "fossil fuels" in centre frame as the culprit for climate change, and calls for a "transitioning away from fossil fuels" and "accelerated action in this critical decade". It also seeks accelerated efforts towards the "phase-down of unabated coal power."
Potentially, through smoke and mirrors in the form of clever ambiguous drafting, the agreement could allow room for delay and be manipulated to promote fossil fuel expansion. It could also be used (abused) to slow down the necessary transfer of massive fossil fuel subsidies to the vital task of transitioning consumers and businesses onto clean energy technologies.
[…] Under the guise of emissions 'abatement' technologies such as unproven carbon capture and storage, together with the "energy sector" qualification, the Climate deal risks being used to endorse 'runaway fossil fuels'. That is the greatest fear of many small islands’ right now. It is the exact opposite of what the Paris Agreement requires. This is why several small island negotiators shed tears as we absorbed the gravity of the final agreement.
The agreement lacks the desperate urgency required at this time in history. This COP was the moment for governments to commit to the 'fossil fuel phase-out' that was backed by 130 countries, in line with the 1.5°C science pathways and the clear direction outlined by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Yet it was removed from the draft text by the UAE Presidency upon the objections of a powerful minority.
Of huge concern to us is that the President gavelled the final outcomes while all 39 countries in the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) were not yet back in the plenary room.
[…] Overall, some of the terms appear to be an attempt to weaken or distract from the clarity and certainty of the Paris Agreement's goal to limit warming to 1.5°C, our North Star. We will not tolerate any suggestion that the language used has the effect of deviating us from that course.
The Small Island States will go forward taking a rights-based approach to our climate advocacy and diplomacy. We will uphold and enforce the rule of law and States' obligations to comply with their international law human rights obligations to protect the human rights to life and a clean and healthful environment, and to protect Indigenous Peoples' rights to self-determination, to culture, to heritage, and to their collective possession, reverence for and guardianship of their sovereign lands and waters.”
🪶
The Institute for Small Islands was at COP28 UAE 2023, with four members of the team on the ground. To read the Institute’s commentary on the outcomes and some impressions of COP by Donna Bagnall, member of our legal team hailing from #Australia 🇦🇺, as well as Caroline Mair-Toby, director from the Caribbean, go to:
Director of Climate Action, EU Climate Pact Ambassador, Author, Transformative Education for Sustainable Development, Symworker
1moA government that wants to implement effective climate protection jeopardizes its re-election. Because citizens want climate protection in principle, but only as long as it does not affect their personal comfort zone or their wallets. Low-income households are already disproportionately affected financially by the price increases resulting from CO2 pricing. Effective climate policy must therefore not separate economic considerations from ecological and social aspects. Above all, climate protection measures must also be perceived as fair - only then will they receive mass support and can be implemented. The possible answer could be to separate climate protection from the monetary currency system and intoduce a complementary climate currency ECO (Earth Carbon Obligation). It could be provided to all citizens as an ecological basic income to pay exklusively for fossil consumption.See www.saveclimate.earth