My answer to the second question in the slide below actually sparked a great convo earlier with my colleague Tamar Keenan about how outdated the term "career ladder" is. It makes careers seem so rigid and pre-determined. We don't have to always climb up to progress. It leaves unrealistic expectations and narrows what growth actually means. What should we be saying instead of "career ladder"? Perhaps, we should be calling it "career maps" instead, since there are many different career destinations to consider and pathways to reaching them that are equally as satisfying. This also includes taking the rocket ship up to space (senior management/c-level), which is certainly a destination, but not the only way to grow. I could go on and on, but I'll stop here. Would love to hear your thoughts!
Spotlight on Carol Martindale 🎉 With 8 years at the company and a constantly evolving role, Carol's journey has been anything but ordinary! Did you know she’s on the board of a children’s museum that showcases over 8,000 pieces of art from kids in 100+ countries? Discover more about Carol’s unique path in the slides below 👇
Yes! Career map!!! (Do I need to change my wisdom circle name? 😂)
Career journey? :) As the journey should be the focus, and not so much the destination…
Product Management Consultant I help software product teams get clarity on how their goals translate into executable plans, get their teams aligned, and drive results.
5moCareer evolution? As we go through life we can move up and down hierarchies. We can move back and forth between large organizations and small ones. We can focus on a particular skill set and then move on to complement those skills or change skill sets entirely. When we evolve advantageously we tend to thrive and may continue on that path for a time, when we evolve in a way that is less advantageous we choose to change directions or suffer consequences.