🤝 At Eurosatory, we are proud to announce that Dubai Police HQ and COGES EVENTS signed an MoU, paving the way for collaboration at the World Police Summit in Dubai from 13-15 May, 2025. This agreement focuses on enhancing cooperation, particularly in organizing the French pavilion at the summit, highlighting joint efforts to advance global law enforcement strategies and technologies. The signing ceremony underscored their commitment to fostering international partnerships and knowledge exchange in policing and security, aiming to make WPS 2025 a premier platform for showcasing cutting-edge innovations and best practices in law enforcement. Join us on French Pavillon in May 2025 in Dubai! #Eurosatory2024 #Security #Police #UAE #Dubai #France Fatima Alawar Afroz Abro Khalifa AlRoom Charles BEAUDOUIN Jérémy VIGNA Rayan Hacini GICAT
Eurosatory’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Founder & CEO at Detained in Dubai, Due Process International, IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform & Host of the Gulf in Justice Podcast. Policy Consultant, Crisis Manager, Expert Witness & Human Rights Advocate.
Detained in Dubai - a 51 second insight into our work as crisis managers, Interpol & extradition experts, negotiators and legal advocates. #Dubai #UAE #Interpol #Extradition #DebtNogotiation #CampaignManagement #CrisisManagement #Litigation #HumanRights
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Cabinet Resolution No. (89) of 2022 on the Administrative Fines for Violations Related to the Services of the Federal Authority For Identity, Citizenship, Customs & Port Security For More Information https://lnkd.in/d9QXyxVN info@communicationdubai.com Call / WhatsApp: +971 42663517, +971 502885313 #uae #cabinetresolution #dubai #communicationdubai #uaecabinetesolutions #uaelaws #rulesinuae #uaenewlaw #dubailaws #uaefederallaws #federalauthority "
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
"Cabinet Resolution No. (89) of 2022 on the Administrative Fines for Violations Related to the Services of the Federal Authority For Identity, Citizenship, Customs & Port Security For More Information https://lnkd.in/d_7Bf8P info@communicationdubai.com Call / WhatsApp: +971 42663517, +971 502885313 #uae #cabinetresolution #dubai #communicationdubai #uaecabinetesolutions #uaelaws #rulesinuae #uaenewlaw #dubailaws #uaefederallaws #federalauthority "
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Australia should push for urgent ICC investigation into 7 October crimes and also what is unfolding now in Gaza. Australia should reverse its historical position of opposing ICC investigations into Hamas and Israel. Australia should also set up its own war crimes unit which should include consideration of contemporaneous evidence. Sky News has been presenting unverified evidence regarding 7 October in opinion segments that are not subject to the same requirements regarding factual accuracy. #ICC #Australia
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
As west Africa urbanises, many cities have become interconnected through trade, travel and technology, and crime has increased in complexity and scope. The proliferation of arms in west African cities, especially in the aftermath of conflicts in Libya (2011) and Mali (2012), has added to these challenges in Bamako, Mali’s capital. In this article and my recent study, I analyse the complex relationships between urbanisation and arms trafficking in Bamako. The study focused on how illicit arms shape urban violence and are used by criminal groups.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The AGA-Africa Programme workshop on Combating Financing of Terrorism (CFT) and Combating Proliferations Financing (CPF) in Malawi entered its 3rd day with participants from various law enforcement agencies. During this training, we are affirming two things that are true to the AGA-Africa Programme: 1. The power of collaboration; and 2. Knowledge is power. #FightAgainstTerrorismFinancing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📢UN experts today expressed grave concern about the confirmation of the death sentences against seven individuals by Egypt’s highest court on 24 January 2024, in the so-called "Helwan Brigade” counter-terrorism case. Their executions would constitute arbitrary killings in violation of the right to life as a result of unfair trials and other human rights violations, they said. “Capital punishment may only be carried out after a legal process that guarantees all of the safeguards required by international human rights law,” the experts said. The experts said these cases allegedly involved grave violations of international law, including enforced disappearances and incommunicado detention, torture and forced confessions, denial of access to lawyers and family visits, protracted pre-trial detention, solitary confinement, inhuman detention conditions, and mass trials before special terrorism courts which did not meet fair trial standards. “Egypt has also failed to independently and effectively investigate and remedy these alleged violations as required by international and Egyptian law,” they said. The death sentences further violate international law because they are based on convictions for vague and overly broad terrorist offences, including when these may not meet the threshold of “most serious” crimes. There is also a real risk that executions in practice may constitute prohibited torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. “We urge Egypt to halt these executions, to independently investigate the alleged human rights violations and review the judicial proceedings in light of Egypt’s international obligations,” the experts said. UN experts have previously called on Egypt to suspend executions following repeated allegations of unfair trials in terrorism cases. “We are profoundly concerned that these cases are not isolated but seem to be part of a systematic misuse of counter-terrorism and national security laws, including to impose the death penalty, which undermines human rights and the rule of law,” the experts said. The experts also urged Egypt to consider abolishing the death penalty, in light of the pro-abolitionist spirit of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the recommendations of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in 2023. Note: The seven individuals are Magdy Muhammed Ibrahim Ibrahim, Mahmoud Attia Ahmed Abdulghany, Abdulwahab Mostafa Muhammed Mostafa, Musab Abdulhamid Khalifa, Abdullah Nader Al-Sharqawy, Abdulrahman Issa Abdulkhaliq, and Mahmoud Al-Sayed Amin. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/ekwGRWdu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
“Issues of enhancing cooperation between the security councils as well as law enforcement agencies and intelligence services of the two countries were discussed in detail. Special attention was paid to deepening cooperation in practical aspects of the fight against terrorism and extremism, the spread and propaganda of radical ideology as well as against international organized crime, drug trafficking and laundering of proceeds from criminal activities,” the message read. #Mozambique #Russia #Mocambique
Russia, Mozambique hold security consultations In Maputo – Russian Security Council –
clubofmozambique.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The legal precedent outlined in the case of Ali Nawaz vs State elucidates the jurisdictional intricacies surrounding cases involving firing within court premises. According to Entry-4 of the Third Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, offenses such as firing within court premises are exclusively triable by the Anti-Terrorism Court. Despite being a result of personal vendetta without attracting terrorism charges, such offenses fall within the purview of the Anti-Terrorism Court due to their specific mention in the Act. The transfer of cases from ordinary jurisdiction to the Anti-Terrorism Court hinges on distinct scenarios governed by different legal regimes. If a court of ordinary jurisdiction deems that the scheduled offense under the Anti-Terrorism Act is applicable, it must return the case to the prosecution for presentation before the Anti-Terrorism Court. This is in line with Section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), which mandates magistrates to take cognizance only of offenses they are empowered to try or send to a court of sessions. Additionally, the Anti-Terrorism Court can directly take cognizance of offenses under Section 19(3) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. In cases pending trial, if a question of jurisdiction arises, the court cannot return the case to the prosecution due to the judicial record already in place. Instead, the proper course is to directly send the case from the court of ordinary jurisdiction to the Anti-Terrorism Court. Furthermore, if an offense is included in the third schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 during the pendency of a trial, the case must be immediately transferred to the Anti-Terrorism Court. This applies to cases pending before magistrates, sessions courts, or any other special courts. The Anti-Terrorism Court, despite its designation, retains the authority to determine jurisdiction and may transfer cases back to the court with jurisdiction, as per Section 23 of the Act. Section 346 of the Cr.P.C. empowers magistrates to transfer cases to the court of sessions if lacking jurisdiction. In summary, the legal framework mandates the transfer of cases involving firing within court premises to the Anti-Terrorism Court, with provisions for jurisdictional assessments and potential transfers back to courts with appropriate jurisdiction. References: 1. Ali Nawaz vs State, PCrLJ 658 (2024) 2. Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 3. Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) #wakalatonline #terrorism #ATA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Rédacteur en chef et auteur chez Groupe d'Études pour l'Histoire Ferroviaire - GEHF (Association loi de 1901)
3wBravo ! Félicitations Jérémy.