WWF-Australia’s Post

🌏 In the face of climate change and biodiversity loss, we simply can’t afford lengthy delays in establishing renewable energy projects. Understanding how and why these delays occur is critical to ensure that renewable energy projects in Australia deliver what’s best for people and nature. That’s why we’re excited to partner with the Urban Transformations Research Centre (UTRC) at the University of Western Sydney to help streamline environmental approvals.    ⚡Fast - to address climate change before it’s too late.   🏆Best – to reverse biodiversity loss caused by climate change.  ⚖️Just – to achieve an inclusive and resilient transition for all communities, especially First Nations. We’ll dive deep into data, identify bottlenecks, and work towards improving processes, for strong, clear, and consistent environmental regulations. Achieving an energy transition that’s good for people and nature isn’t easy, but we have the solutions. 💡🌱 Stand by for the project results in August! Meanwhile, learn more about the transition to a renewables future:  https://lnkd.in/g9_yNEVs #WWFAustralia #Renewables #Climate

View profile for Thomas Longden

Environmental, energy & health economist at Western Sydney University (WSU) - Urban Transformations Research Centre (UTRC) - First gen Uni working on decarbonisation and energy related research

Exciting to be partnering with WWF-Australia to investigate environmental approval processes for renewable energy projects across Australia. Our* team at the Urban Transformations Research Centre (UTRC), Western Sydney University will analyse both Federal and State-level approval processes. There’s a lot of speculation about how long renewable energy projects take to get approved. We’ll be doing a deep dive into the data to understand where and why bottlenecks are occurring. We’ll also compare these projects based on their progression to completion and understand whether projects are completed smoothly or end up stranded as project proponents delay construction for other reasons. As shown below, we’ve started with a snapshot of the status of Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) referrals for onshore wind and solar projects. Before May 2022, most projects that were referred to the Federal government did not need approval (i.e. not deemed to be a controlled action under the EPBC Act). Figure 1 shows that 37 wind projects and 7 solar projects were approved, which compares to 126 and 58 projects where approvals weren’t needed. Since May 2022, 15 solar projects have been either approved or were not deemed to be controlled actions. Figure 2 shows that only 2 wind projects have been approved. There are 24 wind projects that are either being assessed or have had an approach determined. This second option means that the department has decided between using the information provided in the referral and another means of assessment, such as requiring an environmental impact statement (EIS). *this project is a collaboration with Samantha Corbett, Carmel Matheson, and Meg Shooter who are joining the UTRC team for this project. This project will extend the study published in #Energy_Economics that focused on total project development lead-times, which found that being referred to the EPBC process led to an average delay of 9–13 months in pre-construction lead-times. Only a few projects solar PV projects needed EPBC approval. https://lnkd.in/gfcinMHs

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics