AI isn’t replacing SDRs, marketing teams are.
At least SDRs that aren’t using tech to plug into their org’s whole GTM motion.
Getting 554 email leads in the next 6 months is totally doable.
IF you take advantage of these 5 performance boosters.
For context, there were 13 campaigns behind this screenshot.
And here are some important notes on the strategy:
1️⃣: 2 step sequences, with 3-4 step subsequences.
2️⃣: 3-4 sentences max each.
3️⃣: Every email had at least 1 sentence that was personalised through Clay formulas or AI.
4️⃣: CTAs offered 1 of 3 things: content, event invites, or meetings.
5️⃣: Sender had an online presence in their B2B niche.
So yes, there is a variation in buying intent across the 554 leads.
But most importantly, every lead was heavily qualified, either through:
Generic filters like company size, location, niche within sector, headcount, and job title.
OR
The above + content/marketing engagement.
So here is the cheat sheet.
👉 Build an online presence (e.g. with LinkedIn or YouTube).
👉 Target qualified leads (ideally marketing-qualified leads).
👉Automate personalisation based on your qualification data (e.g. using Clay).
👉Use content-driven CTAs (e.g. Would you want to see…?)
👉Convert with quick-response subsequences (e.g. send the content and pitch the relevant offer in <30 min).
With Nr. 2, we saw ~10x positive reply rates when ICP-qualified leads had previously engaged with content (upwards of 10% PRRs).
So partially “inbound-led outbound”, but all these campaigns fall under the umbrella of “marketing-led outbound”.
And I’m stealing these terms from Adam Robinson.
So shout out to him, Bethany Stachenfeld, and Patrick Spychalski for inspiring this take with their RB2B x Clay x Sendspark webinar yesterday.
Do you think marketing and sales may as well converge into 1 GTM/Growth team at this point? 👇
PS: And excuse the bounce rate, single-tenant Outlook setups got messy 😅. Also we shut off open tracking for most of these campaigns.